Chuck Marte   Starting Pitcher | Retired or Inactive Players Pitching He can get groundballs when he needs them in a jam. Marte has to keep the ball down, especially against lefties, or he gets hit hard and often. His fastball gets into the high 80s, but it's the sink that makes the pitch effective. The Retired or Inactive Players hope he can work on his control a little bit. Every once and a while one slips away from him and either ends up at the backstop or in the right field bleachers. His stuff becomes less sharp as he gets into the late innings. He comes right after righthanded hitters, who are lucky even to reach base against him, but he works more carefully to lefties. Defense & Hitting He's reasonably quick to the plate but needs to vary his pickoff moves. Good baserunners appeared to time him last year. Marte is nothing special in the field. Marte is a surpisingly good hitting pitcher. And I'm not sure you can say this about a pitcher, but Marte has some pop in his swing. Interesting sidenote, The Retired or Inactive Players have been known to use Marte as a pinch-runner on occasion. 2025 Outlook Marte has below average skills, even for the low minors. One has to expect the Retired or Inactive Players will give him his walking papers before the end of the season. I just don't know if The Retired or Inactive Players are ever going to get what they expect out of him.           -- Ska Nyman, A-Ball Scout

Player Skills Yearly Scouting Report Cards

Year Team AS EN CO HR GF vL Hm Sc CL FB CU SI SL CB SC KN Age Exp Delivery Slot CH PH SP FA Nyman Rating 2001 LET 75 73 24 31 53 40 47 55 46 64 0 49 31 0 0 0 22 0 Overhand Low Minors 0 5 33 29 154 2002 LET 75 73 39 34 53 40 47 55 46 64 0 49 31 0 0 0 23 0 Overhand Low Minors 0 0 3 30 173 2003 LET 76 73 47 36 53 40 47 55 46 65 0 49 41 0 0 0 24 0 Overhand AA/AAA 0 0 0 33 195 2004 LET 75 73 55 40 53 40 47 55 46 66 0 53 46 0 0 0 25 0 Overhand Low Minors 0 0 0 36 214 2005 LET 75 73 63 43 53 40 47 55 46 66 0 53 49 0 0 0 26 0 Overhand Low Minors 0 0 0 41 227 2006 LET 75 73 63 50 53 40 47 55 46 66 0 53 49 0 0 0 27 0 Overhand Low Minors 0 0 0 43 232 2007 LET 77 73 63 50 53 40 47 55 46 66 0 56 49 0 0 0 28 0 Overhand AA/AAA 0 0 0 44 234 2008 LET 77 73 63 50 53 40 47 55 46 66 0 58 50 0 0 0 29 0 Overhand Active 0 0 0 44 235 2009 LET 77 73 63 50 53 40 47 55 46 66 0 59 50 0 0 0 30 0 Overhand Active 0 0 0 44 233 2010 LET 77 73 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 51 0 0 0 31 1 Overhand Active 0 0 0 44 233 2011 LET 76 73 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 51 0 0 0 32 2 Overhand AA/AAA 0 0 0 44 231 2012 LET 76 73 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 52 0 0 0 33 3 Overhand Active 0 0 0 43 231 2013 LET 76 72 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 52 0 0 0 34 4 Overhand AA/AAA 0 0 0 42 228 2014 LET 77 72 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 52 0 0 0 35 5 Overhand AA/AAA 0 0 0 43 229 2015 LET 76 72 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 52 0 0 0 36 6 Overhand AA/AAA 0 0 0 43 226 2016 LET 74 72 63 50 52 40 47 55 46 66 0 60 52 0 0 0 37 7 Overhand Active 0 0 0 43 223 Ratings Delta -2                               +1 +1             -3

CBL Collegiate League Yearly Statistical Records

Year Age Team W L Sv Hld G GS QS CG IP AIP H HR BB SO IR IRS K/9 K/BB Whip Avg Slg LHB RHB ERA Totals     0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

CBL Pioneer League Yearly Statistical Records

Year Age Team W L Sv Hld G GS QS CG IP AIP H HR BB SO IR IRS K/9 K/BB Whip Avg Slg LHB RHB ERA 2001 22 PKEG 5 11 0 0 21 21 5 0 113.1 5.1 124 16 102 73 0 0 5.81 0.72 2.00 .277 .442 .269 .282 7.47 2002 23 PKEG 0 6 12 5 33 0 0 0 43.1 1.1 42 10 19 29 28 13 6.06 1.53 1.42 .253 .488 .289 .240 4.99 2003 24 PKEG 1 5 1 7 51 0 0 0 105.1 2.0 112 8 63 65 23 10 5.57 1.03 1.67 .275 .387 .308 .254 5.47 2004 25 PKEG 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 14 2.1 7 0 4 7 1 0 4.50 1.75 0.79 .143 .163 .231 .043 1.93 2005 26 PKEG 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 8 1.0 7 0 3 4 6 2 4.50 1.33 1.25 .226 .226 .300 .190 1.13 2006 27 PKEG 3 6 13 4 35 0 0 0 36.1 1.0 47 7 21 13 20 8 3.24 0.62 1.88 .313 .547 .387 .261 6.94 2007 28 PKEG 2 4 3 3 48 0 0 0 85.2 1.2 76 15 27 46 19 5 4.86 1.70 1.21 .233 .433 .242 .229 4.52 2008 29 PKEG 4 3 7 4 47 0 0 0 66.1 1.1 92 12 23 32 10 3 4.36 1.39 1.74 .327 .502 .365 .305 5.56 2009 30 PKEG 2 5 3 2 41 0 0 0 82 2.0 68 11 22 27 18 5 2.96 1.23 1.10 .224 .399 .231 .222 3.29 2010 31 PKEG 6 2 8 3 47 0 0 0 72.1 1.2 70 12 28 39 25 10 4.87 1.39 1.36 .254 .449 .277 .240 4.23 2011 32 PKEG 2 4 4 10 70 0 0 0 112 1.2 117 18 37 70 23 5 5.63 1.89 1.38 .264 .440 .276 .258 4.18 2012 33 PKEG 13 2 1 0 22 17 10 0 130 6.0 134 16 29 62 3 0 4.29 2.14 1.25 .263 .422 .244 .277 3.60 2013 34 PKEG 2 4 4 7 59 0 0 0 87 1.1 98 9 24 55 12 2 5.69 2.29 1.40 .279 .439 .267 .284 3.52 2014 35 PKEG 5 6 26 12 60 0 0 0 66.1 1.0 78 8 25 34 27 11 4.63 1.36 1.56 .299 .444 .426 .260 4.21 2015 36 PKEG 2 10 16 14 58 0 0 0 67.1 1.0 87 14 25 38 21 8 5.10 1.52 1.67 .306 .535 .299 .310 5.21 2016 37 PKEG 8 6 26 5 57 0 0 0 86.1 1.2 80 6 26 33 35 15 3.45 1.27 1.23 .245 .340 .270 .232 2.61 Totals     55 74 126 77 664 38 15 0 1175.2 1.2 1239 162 478 627 271 97 4.80 1.31 1.46 .269 .434 .292 .259 4.56

CBL Major League Yearly Statistical Records

Year Age Team W L Sv Hld G GS QS CG IP AIP H HR BB SO IR IRS K/9 K/BB Whip Avg Slg LHB RHB ERA 2009 30 LET 0 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 9 3.0 19 5 3 1 0 0 1.00 0.33 2.44 .422 .844 .500 .316 13.0 2010 31 LET 4 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 38.1 3.1 31 5 13 9 2 0 2.13 0.69 1.15 .218 .373 .179 .253 4.93 2012 33 LET 2 2 1 3 13 0 0 0 13 1.0 12 5 6 6 7 4 4.15 1.00 1.38 .250 .604 .323 .118 4.15 2016 37 LET 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 8.2 2.1 21 1 8 2 0 0 2.20 0.25 3.54 .477 .636 .500 .455 19.7 Totals     6 9 1 3 32 7 0 0 69 2.0 83 16 30 18 9 4 2.35 0.60 1.64 .297 .530 .309 .290 7.57

Chuck Marte's Comparable Players

Player Names Rupert Solverd 94.5% Gowell Santibanez 93.3% Oscal Reynoso 93.3% Derrell Hoke 92.8% Terry Barrich 92.0%

Tip - Click on the club abbreviation to get further details and history.

Transfer history draft picks in brackets indicate the actual pick number in the draft wasn't determined at the time of the deal being made.

Report Cards generated by Biorhythm v2.7.82 on Fri Aug 12 01:15:47 CEST 2011

Report card data printed in red denotes that player was in the top two percent for that category and year. Blue data denotes membership to the bottom two percent.